The Average Fan's View

By Brent Jackson

ALMS fans are celebrating right now at the wicked race at Sears Point and the come-from-behind win by Dyson Racing. It's great Dyson won, as it shows a determined private team can win an ALMS race, and can do it in a LMP675 car. After that, many IMSA fans make comments about IMSA's racing being the best teams and GA's being manufactured. That fact is that assumption is bull**** and nothing less than that - how is it possible for Grand-Am to manufacture racing? Its a double standard, and I personally think this sort of favorites is crap. My point of them being biased was the ALMS event at Trois-Rivieres, a race that drew 31 cars, of which 29 started and only 16 finished. And the two Audis finished five laps up on everyone else, which after JJ Lehto lost a lap in the Champion car, ceased to be a race. We will know if GA can keep the racing going - the Bully Hill Vineyards 250 at Watkins Glen (boy is that a mouthful) is this coming weekend. And it runs alongside the NASCAR Winston Cup race there - GA's task may be to outstage them, which knowing this year may not as difficult as it seems.

As for GAs new GT class rules, I have begun to see a few problems - first, GT cars based on everyday cars on the street just doesn't get hearts racing anything like the thought of Ferraris, Porsches, Moslers and Saleens racing at a sportscar race. It might be a way to connect sportscar racing to the average fan, but that is unlikely to help GA, as NASCAR does exactly the same thing and NASCAR has the benefit of nearly every fan having a driver they love and a driver they hate. (I'm one of those fans, but i'll keep my choices to myself.) One idea many GA board guys came up with is to have a mix of Speed GT cars, modified Ferrari Challenge and Porsche Supercup cars, some of the tube-frame or clipped (part tube-frame) GT cars based on one car or another and some FIA/ACO GT class cars. It might work, but the Speed WC rules have several altercations with GAs proposed 2005 rules. Grand-Am seems to me to be trying to distance itself from ACO/FIA rules, and in my opinion in the GT class it will be to its detriment - most GT cars built in the last decade have been to FIA/ACO rules, and GA cannot expect there to be a lot of GT runners, and even if 2005 DP fields are strong, which they likely will be, GA will again look a little bare - something they should try to avoid.

Even if problems with the GTs come, 2004's Rolex 24 looks quite good. Bets are all over the place on the DP number - anywhere from less than 12 to 20+. I'd personally like the 20+, for obvious reasons. And as the DPs build themselves, the FIA/ACO rules haven't really had much said about them - only VAG has committed to building a 2004-spec prototype, and many fans have had enough of their boardroom-decided battles for marketing purposes as the completely ruin any thought of a race being an actual race and not a bloody prototype demonstration. But then, most other racing series have gotten a tad boring - Trans-Am has been completely dominated by Rocketsports driver Scott Pruett, and his team owner (Paul Gentilozzi) is also the majority owner of the series. Hence Boris Said was suspended earlier in the season for Boris comparing him to Saddam Hussein. Surely there must be some conflict-of-interest in that? No wonder with the dulling IRL and the piss-poor rain-shortened CART race at Road America, which was in horrid conditions to begin with. (why was Mario Andretti's name soiled by such a piece of crap in the first place? I'd bet Mario isn't happy about it.) No wonder people are turning to NASCAR - everything else other than GA people are able to sleep through.

The coming GA race at Watkins Glen and the ALMS round at Mosport will tell who is doing better. Grids wise, bet on ALMS doing better. For keeping fans at the race and watching it on TV riveted to their seats, my money is on the GA race. After all, why can't sportscars show the Winston Cup guys how run a race?


Got comments on this article? Discuss it on the message board!